
Reflection by Grace Nho (scroll below).
By Grace Nho
Cornell Tech
On April 25th, David Gray Widder presented a thought provoking lecture on Epistemic Power in AI Ethics Labor: Legitimizing Located Complaints.
When people ask me why I pursue a career in technology, ironically enough, I always answer with, because I am pessimistic about technology. Before I was introduced to the harms of technology, I used to view engineering and computer science as a gateway to better opportunities for people who would not generally have access to them. But learning about the problems, the biases, the discrimination, the exclusivity that has seeped into our technology, perhaps not intentionally, I realize that there is a lot more work in order to undo some of the harm that has already been inflicted.
Ethics is so important, yet still unprioritized to the extent where sometimes it feels de-incentivized. During the talk, David highlighted some of the unfortunate events that have happened in the industry - of which one has not left my mind : “Microsoft axes ethics team - moves remaining employees within product teams”. He mentioned that employees who were initially a part of this team find it harder to achieve goals now that the team has been disbanded and they are not a collective movement anymore. This has led me to a newfound appreciation for collective teams that move to better the industry that we are in. It’s so hard to be vocal about certain issues when you move alone, but when we start to think about what we can do to make technology more inclusive together, we start to empathize and become more aware of things that could sometimes be overlooked.
David raises a good question about epistemic power - how can we share this epistemic power with others that generally might not? Before we talk about how we can share epistemic power, we have to understand what epistemic power is. Epistemic power refers to the ability or authority to produce, shape, or control knowledge and understanding within a given context or field. In the context of the lecture, it more specifically talked about how epistemic power in AI is based on automation and quantification to achieve legitimacy and how it can be the cause of the imbalance because this approach delegitimizes located complaints and diminishes the importance of embodied and lived experiences.
In the paper, David proposed the concept of "humble technical practices," which are quantified or technical approaches that explicitly acknowledge their epistemic limitations. By doing so, these practices aim to flatten hierarchies of epistemic power and make space for a more inclusive and equitable understanding of AI ethics that incorporates diverse perspectives, including lived experiences. While I agree that that is a good way to approach the problem, I began to think about how we can incorporate this ”humble technical practices” into rather generic software engineering roles.
Which brings me back to why I want to be a part of the tech space. These power imbalances are tricky, they require the epistemically powerful (generally us) to cede and share the power. There was a deep discussion during the seminar about if and how we can share epistemic power and several solutions and suggestions were shared. This included participatory AI approaches, practice talking from your own lived experience, seeking to elevate those with lived experience. While the solutions may sound obvious, you come to realize that it can actually be idealistic, rather than pragmatic.
Ethics in the field of technology is a difficult space, but much needed nonetheless, to navigate. It’s even more difficult to come to a consensus because diverse lived experiences will have different takes on ethics. This seminar and talk was thought provoking and brought me back to my purpose of wanting to pursue a career in the tech space. How will I put “humble technical practice” into actual practice? How can I try to focus more on lived experiences? That’s for me to find out on the next leg of my career, but it’s a question that I will keep on my mind.
泰國果凍威而鋼 vigrx MAXMAN goodman增大丸 大陰莖 綠騎士持久液
美國黑金副作用 印度神油持久液 德國黑金剛 2H2D 高潮液 英國威馬副作用
壯陽藥哪裡買 持久液 犀利士官網 威而鋼哪裡買 希愛力 英國威馬藥局
犀利士 美國黑金官網 屈臣氏日本籐素 樂威壯 必利吉 必利勁哪裡買
生精片哪裡買 生精片效果 生精片可以每天吃 生精片心得 生精片評價 必利勁治療 必利勁沒用 日本籐素飲酒 日本籐素無效 一炮到天亮評價 一炮到天亮哪裡買 泰國果凍持續多久 奇力片評價 奇力片效果 奇力片成分 奇力片副作用 果凍威而鋼哪裡買 日本籐素會變大嗎 日本籐素藥效有多久 日本籐素禁忌 日本籐素是什麼 日本籐素吃2顆 日本籐素副作用 日本籐素效果 日本籐素沒用 日本籐素哪裡買
藍色小藥丸副作用 威而鋼四分之一顆 樂威壯在哪裡買 必利勁用法 樂威壯硬度 威而鋼心得 美國黑金心得 生精片是什麼 犀力士禁忌 美國黑金無效 高血壓威而鋼 日本藤素可以每天吃
德國黑金剛持久液 加強版綠騎士持久液 goodman增大丸 maxman taiwan vimax增大丸 萬艾可 VigRXPlus 美國黃金偉哥 老中醫補腎丸 一炮到天亮 英國威馬台灣總代理 印度神油哪裡買 享硬瑪卡 威而鋼不能跟什麼一起吃 犀利士5mg副作用 必利勁可以每天吃 必利勁能根治早洩 什麼人不能吃威而鋼